Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165484›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Identifying Inferior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block: Seeing Through the Block.

Poornima Vinod, Bala Pushparaji, Maxine Nelson, Christopher Cunningham, Kathleen Quealy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Poornima VinodDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: pvinod1@metrohealth.org.
Bala PushparajiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Maxine NelsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Christopher CunninghamDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Kathleen QuealyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosing acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) is challenging because baseline repolarization abnormalities can mask ischemic changes, delaying recognition and worsening outcomes. CASE SUMMARY: An 81-year-old woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease presented with acute chest discomfort and dyspnea. Electrocardiography demonstrated a preexisting LBBB with new inferior ST-segment elevation. Emergent coronary angiography performed revealed an occluded mid-right coronary artery. She underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent placement. DISCUSSION: Inferior STEMI with LBBB is uncommon but remains high risk. The traditional STEMI/non-STEMI paradigm misses many occlusive infarctions, prompting adoption of the Occlusion MI framework. Although the original Sgarbossa criteria are specific but insensitive, modified Sgarbossa criteria using proportional ST deviation improve sensitivity with preserved specificity. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: In patients with LBBB, accurate identification of acute coronary occlusion requires integration of modified Sgarbossa criteria with clinical judgment, rather than relying on LBBB alone.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeelectrocardiogrammyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID42165484
PMCPMC13198091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.