Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165326›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026

Reproducibility of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability in Untreated Hypertensive Patients.

Aikaterini Lykka, Ionas Papasotiriou, Gerasimos Barlas, Sotiria Spiliopoulou, Damianos Dragonas, Konstantinos Rizogiannis, Efstathios Manios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aikaterini LykkaDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ionas PapasotiriouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Gerasimos BarlasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE.
Sotiria SpiliopoulouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Damianos DragonasDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos RizogiannisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Efstathios ManiosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the optimal BPV index in terms of prognosis and reproducibility remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of ambulatory BPV indices in untreated hypertensive patients. A total of 100 never-treated hypertensive patients underwent two ambulatory BP recordings within a 4-week period. For each patient, we computed BPV indices, such as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), weighted SD (wSD), average real variability (ARV), time rate (TR) of BP variation, and dipping for systolic and diastolic BP. Statistical analyses were performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Reliability analysis using ICC revealed moderate reproducibility (ICC from 0.540 to 0.715) for 24 h systolic SD, wSD, CV, ARV, TR, dipping, diastolic SD, wSD, CV, and ARV and poor reproducibility (ICC < 0.5) for the 24 h diastolic TR and dipping. The ICC values for daytime BPV revealed moderate reproducibility (ICC from 0.537 to 0.672) for daytime systolic SD, CV, diastolic SD, and CV but poor reproducibility (ICC < 0.5) for daytime systolic ARV, TR, diastolic ARV, and TR. All nighttime BPV indices exhibited poor reproducibility. This study demonstrated that most 24 h and daytime BPV indices showed moderate reproducibility, whereas nighttime BPV indices and diastolic BP dipping showed poor reproducibility. Additionally, systolic BPV was more reproducible than diastolic BPV.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAdultAgedCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsambulatory blood pressurehypertensionreproducibilityvariability

Identifiers

PMID42165326
PMCPMC13240107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.