ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026
Reproducibility of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability in Untreated Hypertensive Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Confounding Role of Cuff-Induced Sleep Fragmentation on Nighttime Blood Pressure Variability Reproducibility.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Expanding Upon Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Reproducibility: Methodological and Clinical Perspectives.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the optimal BPV index in terms of prognosis and reproducibility remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of ambulatory BPV indices in untreated hypertensive patients. A total of 100 never-treated hypertensive patients underwent two ambulatory BP recordings within a 4-week period. For each patient, we computed BPV indices, such as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), weighted SD (wSD), average real variability (ARV), time rate (TR) of BP variation, and dipping for systolic and diastolic BP. Statistical analyses were performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Reliability analysis using ICC revealed moderate reproducibility (ICC from 0.540 to 0.715) for 24 h systolic SD, wSD, CV, ARV, TR, dipping, diastolic SD, wSD, CV, and ARV and poor reproducibility (ICC < 0.5) for the 24 h diastolic TR and dipping. The ICC values for daytime BPV revealed moderate reproducibility (ICC from 0.537 to 0.672) for daytime systolic SD, CV, diastolic SD, and CV but poor reproducibility (ICC < 0.5) for daytime systolic ARV, TR, diastolic ARV, and TR. All nighttime BPV indices exhibited poor reproducibility. This study demonstrated that most 24 h and daytime BPV indices showed moderate reproducibility, whereas nighttime BPV indices and diastolic BP dipping showed poor reproducibility. Additionally, systolic BPV was more reproducible than diastolic BPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.