Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Serum Virus-Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Clinical Trial Participants With and Without Immunocompromise Receiving Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody for COVID-19.
Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of the Monoclonal Antibody VYD222 in Healthy Adult Participants
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VYD222 for Prevention of COVID-19 (CANOPY)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPemivibart received emergency use authorization for COVID-19 prevention in certain individuals with immunocompromise based on immunobridging calculated serum virus-neutralizing antibody (csVNA) titers. We report an analysis of measured (msVNA) titers against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants before and after receipt of pemivibart in a SARS-CoV-2 immune-experienced population (CANOPY) and compare the relationship between csVNA and msVNA titers in 2 clinical trials.
methodsThe trials were conducted during 2023-2024. In the phase 3 CANOPY trial, participants with (cohort A) or without (cohort B) significant immunocompromise received 2 intravenous 4500-mg pemivibart or placebo infusions 90 days apart. In the phase 1 trial, healthy adults received a single intravenous dose of pemivibart (1500, 2500, or 4500 mg). msVNA titers were determined using a SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped assay; csVNA titers were calculated as serum pemivibart concentrations divided by variant-specific IC50 values from in vitro neutralization assays.
resultsIn CANOPY, predose msVNA geometric mean titers (GMTs) to the dominant circulating XBB.1.5 lineage were low across cohorts (range, 78.6-119.8), suggesting inadequate protection. msVNA titers were substantially higher against earlier Delta (B.1.617.2) and BA.4/5 variants. Pemivibart increased the day-28 msVNA GMT >55-fold against XBB.1.5, with similar levels in both cohorts. Across trials, csVNA titers were significantly correlated with msVNA titers (all Spearman correlation coefficients ≥0.73, P < .0001).
conclusionsThese data show that previous immune experience to earlier pandemic variants provided limited cross-protection and demonstrate that pemivibart increased protective titers against newly circulating SARS-CoV-2 in individuals with and without immunocompromise. Notably, csVNA titers effectively predicted pemivibart's neutralization potential. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT06039449 and NCT05791318.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.