ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Burn Rehabilitation Exercise Adherence and Its Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Social Cognitive Theory.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the level of functional exercise adherence in patients during burn rehabilitation and identify its key influencing factors based on social cognitive theory (SCT). A cross-sectional study was conducted among 220 patients undergoing burn rehabilitation, selected from three tertiary hospitals using convenience sampling. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, a functional exercise adherence scale, an SCT-related variables scale for patients with burns, the visual analogue scale, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Self-Rating Depression Scale. Descriptive statistics, group comparison analysis, correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to analyse the data. The total score of functional exercise adherence in patients undergoing burn rehabilitation was 32.68 ± 6.72 points, with 31.8% (70 cases) showing low adherence, 52.3% (115 cases) showing moderate adherence and 15.9% (35 cases) showing high adherence. Correlation analysis revealed that self-efficacy (r = 0.623, p < 0.001), positive outcome expectation (r = 0.587, p < 0.001), social support (r = 0.514, p < 0.001) and behavioural self-regulation (r = 0.492, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with adherence, whereas negative outcome expectation (r = -0.386, p < 0.001), pain score (r = -0.321, p < 0.001), anxiety score (r = -0.295, p < 0.001) and depression score (r = -0.278, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that self-efficacy, social support, behavioural self-regulation, pain intensity and educational level were independent predictors of functional exercise adherence. Patients undergoing burn rehabilitation generally demonstrate moderate adherence to functional exercise, with room for improvement. Interventions that boost self-efficacy, optimise social support, enhance behavioural self-regulation and manage pain effectively can improve exercise adherence and foster better rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.