Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165169›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026

Dietetic-Led Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Proof-of-Concept.

Copeland G Winten, Esben Strodl, Gabriella Heruc, Joanne Avery, Kamryn T Eddy, Lynda J Ross, Jennifer J Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Copeland G WintenSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-1982
Esben StrodlSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7149-6395
Gabriella HerucEating Disorders and Nutrition Research Group, Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-6828
Joanne AverySchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8526-1642
Kamryn T EddyEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-0930
Lynda J RossSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-4130
Jennifer J ThomasEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-581X

Funding

Mentorship in Biobehavioral Mechanisms of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake DisorderK24MH135189 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JENNIFER JOANNE THOMAS · 2023 to 2026
$747k
Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipNIMH NIH HHS K24 MH135189NIMH NIH HHS K24MH135189Rubenstein Charitable Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) is an emerging treatment for ARFID, but to date, it has only been delivered by mental health clinicians. Given the relevance of nutrition to treatment goals, we adapted the treatment to be dietetic-led (D-CBT-AR).

methodWe conducted a pilot trial of D-CBT-AR. Participants self-referred to a multidisciplinary eating-disorder clinic in Brisbane, Australia, and attended in person or virtually. Participants rated D-CBT-AR on acceptability and feasibility. We also measured changes in ARFID psychopathology, Body Mass Index, and co-morbid psychopathology.

resultsOf the 12 participants offered D-CBT-AR, 92% (n = 11) took up the treatment, and 72% (n = 8) completed, with a median treatment length of 33 weeks. The majority of completers rated D-CBT-AR above benchmarks on feasibility (89%) and acceptability (78%). Using intent-to-treat analyses, participants reported large and significant improvements in ARFID psychopathology on all subscales of the Pica, ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview. They incorporated a median of 26 new foods. For those who were weight-suppressed, Body Mass Index increased by 1.5 bands from pre- to post-treatment, though effects were non-significant. Participants also reported large and significant reductions in clinical impairment, depression, and stress. Additionally, at 6-months post-treatment, five participants met remission criteria. DISCUSSION: The trial shows proof-of-concept for the feasibility and acceptability of D-CBT-AR. Although requiring replication in larger and randomized controlled trials, our findings highlight the potential of D-CBT-AR to expand the types of professionals who could effectively deliver CBT-AR, thereby increasing access to care for individuals living with ARFID.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyDieteticsFeeding and Eating DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudyTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultavoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)cognitive‐behavioral therapycognitive‐behavioral therapy for ARFID (CBT‐AR)dietitianeating disordersmalnutritionnutritionpsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID42165169
PMCPMC13349403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.