Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Applying metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder to adolescents: results from an open trial with 3- and 6-months follow-up.

Hanne Undheim Hoff, Odin Hjemdal, Henrik Nordahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanne Undheim HoffDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Odin HjemdalDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Henrik NordahlDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In adults, Metacognitive therapy (MCT) for Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has demonstrated to be an effective treatment, and even superior to comparisons in randomized controlled trials. One explanation for these results can be that MCT directly modifies dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs (including beliefs about worry as uncontrollable) which in the metacognitive model are assumed to be the underlying mechanisms in excessive worrying and emotional distress. However, MCT for GAD has not been specifically evaluated in adolescents, which we therefore aimed to do in the current study. Methods: Ten adolescents with primary GAD were treated in a Norwegian Specialist Mental Health Care Setting by trained MCT therapists. Diagnoses were evaluated at pre- and post-treatment. Adolescent and parental self-report measures were used at pre- and post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. In addition, distress, metacognitive strategies and beliefs were reported on a sessional basis. Results: At post-treatment, nine out of 10 patients no longer met the diagnostic criteria for GAD, and several patients also recovered from comorbid disorders. The effect sizes from pre- to post-treatment on symptom measures and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs were large and maintained at follow-up. Session-to-session descriptive data indicated a linear decrease in distress and metacognitive strategies and beliefs. Conclusion: These results provide preliminary evidence that MCT is associated with positive effects for adolescents with GAD and supports larger scale evaluations.

Indexed as

adolescentsgeneralized anxietymechanismsmetacognitive therapyworry

Identifiers

PMID42165062
PMCPMC13183643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.