ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Retrospective evaluation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for enhancing arousal in patients with minimally conscious state: a single-centre study in Inner Mongolia, China.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting multiple brain regions on the recovery of consciousness in patients with minimally conscious state (MCS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on MCS patients between August 2022 and March 2024. Some patients received only conventional rehabilitation treatment, while others received additional TMS therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) at three time points: before treatment (T0), two weeks post-treatment (T1), and one month post-treatment (T2). Additional assessments included electroencephalogram (EEG), brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Results: A total of 30 patients were included and divided equally into two groups. The GCS and CRS-R scores of the 15 patients who received TMS therapy demonstrated significant improvements at T1 and T2. Furthermore, these patients exhibited significant enhancements in EEG and BAEP grading at T1. Conclusion: The findings suggest that adjunctive multi-target high-frequency repetitive TMS may promote recovery of consciousness in MCS patients. These results underscore the potential of repetitive TMS as a therapeutic intervention for MCS and warrant further investigation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.