ArticleSocial and personality psychology compass2025
Scientific Impact on Socially Beneficial Behaviors: Impact and Efficiency Evidence From Behavior Change Interventions.
Article in Social and personality psychology compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Psychology and related fields have developed a science of behavior change that supports interventions in various areas, including health, sustainability, and education. This review assesses the contributions of each discipline to the performance (i.e., efficacy) and efficiency (i.e., cost-effectiveness) of these interventions. We analyzed published experimental studies targeting 16 intervention targets, including knowledge, beliefs, social norms, social support, access, and habits. For each target, we estimated its prevalence in the literature, its efficacy in changing behavior, and its cost-effectiveness in improving outcomes. We then used GPT to assess the degree to which 14 academic disciplines (e.g., social psychology, psychology, communication, economics, and engineering) are linked to each target, based on their centrality to conceptualizing and measuring it. These disciplinary ratings were combined with target efficacy and cost-effectiveness to estimate each discipline's overall contribution to behavioral change. Psychology, including social and cognitive psychology, made the largest contribution to efficacious interventions, followed by communication, public health, and medicine. Economics and neuroscience were associated with the most cost-effective interventions, although all disciplines fell significantly below a common benchmark for cost-effectiveness in the health sector (i.e., $50,000 QALY). Despite its efficacy and cost-effectiveness, psychology receives relatively limited federal funding compared to other disciplines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.