Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165023›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Outcomes of frozen embryo transfers from a large monocentric cohort (2982 cycles): towards a preferential use of cycles with a

Julie Labrosse, Emilie Haab, Frida Entezami, Nathalie Massin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie LabrosseDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Emilie HaabDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Frida EntezamiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Nathalie MassinDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To determine if endometrial preparation protocols for frozen embryo transfers (FET) impact clinical and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A monocentric cohort study including all first autologous FET cycles of a single blastocyst from January 1st, 2020 to September 30th, 2023. The primary endpoint was live birth (LBR). Secondary endpoints included hCG-positive pregnancy (> 100 IU/l), ongoing pregnancy (OPR), miscarriage, birthweight and term. Outcomes were also analyzed by subgroup: Day 5/Day 6 embryos. Among the 2982 FET cycles, 1507 (50.5%) were artificial cycles (AC) and 1475 (49.5%) were cycles with a Results: Age at the time of transfer (35.3 Conclusion: Our study pleads for a preferential use of CLC protocols for endometrial preparation for FET in ovulatory women.

Indexed as

Corpus LuteumCryopreservationEmbryo TransferEndometriumAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective Studiesartificial cyclefrozen embryo transferhormone replacement therapylive birthnatural cycle

Identifiers

PMID42165023
PMCPMC13183535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.