ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Strengthening One Health implementation at the national and subnational levels in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A 5-step implementation framework.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Qualitative Assessment of One Health Operationalization at the Central Level and in Two Border Districts of Sierra Leone.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) institutionalized the One Health approach over a decade ago to address complex challenges at the human-animal-environment interface. This study assessed the level of knowledge integration achieved through One Health implementation at national and subnational levels and identified key challenges and actions for sustainable implementation. Methods: We applied the framework and tool developed by the Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) to evaluate knowledge integration across six dimensions: Systems Thinking, Planning, Transdisciplinary Working, Sharing, Learning, and Systemic Organization. The tool was translated into French and used by trained interviewers to collect data from stakeholders involved in One Health activities. For analysis, we aggregated the data according to participant characteristics (site, sector, gender) and calculated dimension scores, as well as the One Health Index (OHI) and the Ratio (OHR), which compares operational aspects (Thinking, Planning, Transdisciplinary working) with infrastructure dimensions (Learning, Sharing, Systemic Organization). We used data from multisectoral participatory workshops to identify challenges and activities to sustainable One Health implementation across governance levels. Results: A total of 138 stakeholders were interviewed across eight sites, including national, provincial (Kinshasa, Équateur, Haut-Katanga, Kasaï-Oriental, Kwilu, Kwango), and communal levels. Participants represented human (45%), animal (38%), and environment (17%) health sectors. The findings reveal limited knowledge integration capacity with variation across governance levels with encouraging performance for operational dimensions (Planning, Thinking and Transdisciplinary working). However, the infrastructure (Sharing, Learning and Systemic Organization) to sustain this collaboration is limited or inexistent. The Thinking dimension scored highest nationally (0.75), while Systemic Organization was strongest in Kwango (0.70). Conclusion: We propose a 5-step implementation framework starting from sector-specific capacity development to the development of a common vision as part of a multisectoral coordination backed by political commitment and funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.