ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
The Role of Biodegradable Collagen Matrices in Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: Practical Considerations in the Post-Ologen Era.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term success in glaucoma filtration surgery critically depends on effective modulation of postoperative wound healing, with excessive subconjunctival fibrosis remaining the principal cause of bleb failure. Biodegradable collagen matrices have been introduced as adjunctive spacers to preserve early subconjunctival space and influence bleb formation through biomechanical and structural mechanisms, offering a conceptually distinct alternative to antimetabolites. Clinical experience indicates that these implants are generally feasible and safe; however, reported outcomes are heterogeneous, reflecting meaningful differences in material properties that challenge the assumption of interchangeability. The intermittent unavailability of biodegradable collagen matrices (Ologen), the only collagen matrix specifically developed for ophthalmic use, has prompted increasing off-label adoption of non-ophthalmic collagen dural substitutes and viscoelastic spacers in an effort to replicate its wound-modulating role. This shift raises important questions regarding how devices engineered for other anatomical environments behave in the subconjunctival space, as well as ethical considerations related to off-label implantation in the absence of robust comparative evidence. This editorial examines biodegradable collagen matrices from a practical, biomaterial-informed perspective, emphasizing structural considerations, responsible off-label use, and the need for explicit patient counselling. It also outlines priorities for the development of ophthalmic-specific collagen matrices with predictable space-maintaining and degradation properties. Ultimately, a more biomaterial-conscious and evidence-informed approach is needed to guide implant selection and improve long-term surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.