ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Polypropylene wiping cloths contaminated with
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cross-contamination from contaminated wiping cloths is an underrecognized route of pathogen transmission in healthcare settings. Reused, misapplied, or ineffective disinfectants can transfer viable bacteria between surfaces. Methods: Hydrogen peroxide (HP), a quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and an ethoxylated alcohol (EA) cleaner were tested with cotton, microfiber, and meltblown polypropylene wipes. Wipes inoculated with ∼ 7 log Results: HP-based wipes demonstrated the highest bactericidal efficacy, transferring little to no viable bacteria. Polypropylene wipes consistently transferred fewer bacteria than cotton or microfiber wipes. Wipes with QAC or EA, particularly those made of cotton, transferred significantly more bacteria to surfaces and gloves. Adding layers of wipe material reduced bacterial transfer, especially for microfiber. Conclusion: Chemistry and wipe material both significantly impact bacterial transfer during cleaning. HP with polypropylene wipes offered the most effective reduction in cross-contamination. Cotton and microfiber wipes paired with QAC or EA exhibited higher transfer risks, likely due to electrostatic interactions contributing to reduced antimicrobial activity. These findings emphasize the need for optimized wipe-chemistry combinations to ensure effective surface decontamination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.