Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164949›Full record

ArticleThe journal of climate change and health

Beyond rural: A time-based measure for urban, rural, remote, and geographically isolated response.

Daryl Schaffer, Alec Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daryl SchafferCenter for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
Alec BennettCenter for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In disaster doctrine, urban and rural definitions are typically based on population size and distance (kilometers or miles) from urban, road-accessible locations. Associated guidelines and assumptions are challenging to apply for islands and off-the-road locations. Disaster response models have become stagnant despite advances in transportation modes and climate change adaptations. With no consistent definition of rural, a gap exists on what is considered remote and the reality of being geographically isolated. Proposed here are time-based guidelines on four geographic settings correlated to the arrival of the initial disaster emergency response at a location deemed "urban" as under 10 minutes, "rural" under an hour, "remote" under 24 hours, and "geographically isolated" over 24 hours.

Indexed as

Climate changeDisaster responseGeographically isolatedIslandRemoteRural

Identifiers

PMID42164949
PMCPMC13184500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.