Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164907›Full record

ArticleFood quality and preference2022

The effects of presenting health and environmental impacts of food on consumption intentions.

Aimee E Pink, Katerina S Stylianou, Li Ling Lee, Olivier Jolliet, Bobby K Cheon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food quality and preference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aimee E PinkSchool of Social Sciences (Psychology), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-7922
Katerina S StylianouSchool of Public Health (Environmental Health Sciences), University of Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9716-4068
Li Ling LeeSchool of Social Sciences (Psychology), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Olivier JollietSchool of Public Health (Environmental Health Sciences), University of Michigan, USA.
Bobby K CheonSchool of Social Sciences (Psychology), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6815-619X

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current patterns of food consumption are detrimental to our health and the environment. Consumers need to make informed changes to their diets but due to a lack of understanding of the health and environment benefits/risks of foods, this is difficult to do. The current study examines the effectiveness of a novel food label, the Health Nutrition Index (HENI; minutes of healthy life gained/lost per serving), that communicates the health benefits/risks of foods, and identifies how consumers negotiate and prioritise health and environmental concerns of foods. Participants (

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintConsumer BehaviourFood LabellingMinutes of Healthy Life

Identifiers

PMID42164907
PMCPMC13186242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.