Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164861›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Path to future markets: Method for quantifying long-duration energy storage competitiveness.

Farzan ZareAfifi, Zabir Mahmud, Sarah Kurtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farzan ZareAfifiSchool of Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Zabir MahmudSchool of Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Sarah KurtzSchool of Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy storage technologies with a range of durations are essential for addressing solar and wind generation variability in renewable-energy-driven grids. This study defines long-duration energy storage (LDES) as a system where the energy reservoir can be scaled independently of the power conversion hardware and introduces a modeling method to quantify LDES competitiveness relative to lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), today's dominant grid-scale storage. To demonstrate the model, this study examines California's solar-dominated grid to identify the LDES reservoir size that will be most cost-competitive by balancing both power and energy cost competitiveness. Further model demonstration quantifies how scaling up the energy reservoir size relative to the power rating can enable LDES to compete even at efficiencies as low as 30% for strict carbon-emissions scenarios, playing a crucial role in maintaining grid resiliency. While LDES may support reliability by providing reserve capacity, this model minimizes electricity delivery cost to a predefined load.

Indexed as

applied sciencesenergy storagematerials application

Identifiers

PMID42164861
PMCPMC13186050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.