ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
Qualitative evaluation of a coaching and leadership program for early-stage researchers in KL2 and T32 training programs.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early-stage clinical and translational researchers require not only technical expertise but also leadership and communication skills for long-term success. Many training programs lack structured approaches to building these essential "soft skills." Objective: To evaluate the impact and perceived value of a structured coaching and leadership program for trainees in KL2 and T32 programs. Methods: This qualitative evaluation assessed a Coaching and Leadership Program (CLP) that include individualized coaching and group workshops incorporating leadership development and the DISC behavioral communication model (Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve KL2 and postdoctoral T32 trainees between July and August 2025. Transcripts were analyzed using descriptive content analysis and inductive coding by two analysts in MAXQDA. Results: Five key themes emerged: 1) Both T and K trainees consistently described the CLP as a broadly positive and beneficial experience; 2) Coaching helped trainees build concrete organizational strategies, particularly around time management and logistical processes; 3) The CLP helped build trainees' confidence and professional identity, especially around communication with mentors, bosses, or their team; 4) The CLP was perceived as complementary and well integrated within KL2 and T32 training, particularly by addressing "soft skills" missing elsewhere; and 5) Participants recommended stronger orientation, more opportunities for practical skill-building during sessions, and offering greater variety and choice in coaches. Conclusions: The CLP complements scientific training for early-career translational researchers. Trainees gained practical tools for team management, conflict resolution, and strategic planning, while benefiting from a confidential space for professional growth. Findings suggest coaching is a valuable enhancement to training programs for developing translational research leaders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.