ArticleJournal of translational autoimmunity2026
Utility of the monocyte CD64/neutrophil CD64 ratio in autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases: A retrospective observational study.
Article in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinguishing superimposed infection from disease flare in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases remains challenging, because neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is sensitive for infection but may have reduced specificity in this setting. We evaluated the monocyte-to-neutrophil CD64 ratio (mCD64/nCD64 ratio) as an adjunctive biomarker in a single-center retrospective study of 408 patients with inflammatory conditions (infection, n = 242; non-infectious inflammation, n = 166). Diagnostic performance of nCD64 and the ratio was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis and net reclassification improvement (NRI), including a prespecified subgroup of 86 patients with systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases to distinguish flares (n = 60) from superimposed infections (n = 26). In the overall cohort, nCD64 showed high accuracy for infection (AUC 0.791), similar to the ratio (AUC 0.764). In the autoimmune/autoinflammatory subgroup, the ratio outperformed nCD64 (AUC 0.926 vs 0.870; p = 0.030) with high sensitivity (96.2%), and improved reclassification (total NRI 0.76; p < 0.001), driven mainly by correct identification of non-infected patients (NRI non-events 0.53). These findings suggest that the mCD64/nCD64 ratio may better distinguish flares from superimposed infections than nCD64 alone in autoimmune/autoinflammatory disease, supporting rule-out decisions when immunosuppressive therapy is being considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.