ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Investigating the double-edged sword effect of GenAI use on international students' school adjustment.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of increasingly frequent global educational exchanges, the issue of international students' school adjustment has attracted much attention. The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) has brought new perspectives to research in this field, but existing studies have insufficiently explored the mechanisms by which it influences international students' school adjustment. Based on the COR, this study collected 331 valid questionnaires from non-Chinese international students enrolled in three universities in North and South China through a three-stage time-lagged questionnaire survey to explore the double-edged sword effect of GenAI use on international students' school adjustment. The results show that: on the one hand, GenAI use is associated with better school adjustment by positively predicting international students' self-efficacy over a one-week lag; on the other hand, it is associated with poorer school adjustment by negatively correlating with their sense of school membership. Furthermore, AI literacy strengthens the positive path through which GenAI use affects school adjustment via self-efficacy, while buffering the negative path through which GenAI use affects school adjustment via school membership. This study not only helps explain the complex mechanism of GenAI use on international students' school adjustment but also provides practical guidance for international student education management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.