ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mental health stigma and legal responses to defendants with mental health conditions in Bulgaria, Japan, and Norway.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article investigates, from a legal perspective, how criminal justice systems in Bulgaria, Japan, and Norway produce mental health stigma in their legal responses to defendants with mental health conditions. Although these countries operate within distinct legal traditions and cultural contexts, they all employ special rules on criminal responsibility and special preventive measures for this group of defendants. These rules and their application in legal practice may produce stigma through the association of legal notions, such as insanity and dangerousness, with psychiatric notions of mental disorders. Moreover, in all three countries the systems for the treatment and societal re-integration of defendants subjected to special preventive measures give rise to issues of separation and structural stigma. Our investigation indicates that there are profound challenges in all three countries, but that the pathways for stigma differ. In Japan and Bulgaria, societal stigma seems to interact with legal frameworks within a collectivistic culture in ways that disadvantage defendants with mental health conditions, while in Norway stigma appears to be more subtly embedded in risk-focused policies despite strong welfare structures. Importantly for further research however, our comparative discussion suggests that stigma in this context is not merely a cultural by product but is actively produced and reinforced through legal categories, practices, and policy choices. The findings highlight the need for legal reform focused on modernising legal terminology, mitigating discriminatory associations between legal and psychiatric constructs, and strengthening community-based pathways for treatment and reintegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.