SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
A qualitative meta-analysis on the lived experience of siblings of persons with mental illness.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Having a brother or sister with mental illness (MI) has a profound effect on well-siblings' health, quality of life, and relationships, and there is relatively little knowledge about their needs for information and support. The article presents a qualitative meta-analysis examining the lived experience of well-siblings of persons with MI. We explored the EBSCOHost, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science, with regards to the search terms "sibling* or brother* or sister*" AND "mental ill or mental illness or mental disease* or mental disorder*" in the abstract, AND "qualitativ* or thematic analys* or grounded theory or phenomenolog* or content analys* or narrative analys*" in any field. Using a critical-constructivist grounded theory qualitative meta-analytic approach, from 369 potentially eligible articles, we reviewed 42 qualitative studies (a total of 565 participants; 63.2% sisters) to understand the lived experience of well-siblings of persons with MI. Inclusion criteria were: (a) be peer-reviewed journal articles published until November 30, 2025; (b) be a qualitative study; (c) be in the English language; and (d) focus exclusively on describing the experience of well-siblings of persons with MI. Findings indicated that MI significantly affects well-siblings' emotions, health, and well-being, as well as academic, working, and personal life; that well-siblings feel excluded, abandoned or treated as secondary, and have to keep their needs or feeling to themselves or have to suppress them not to burden others. Findings also indicated that well-siblings express their need of information on MI issues, as well as their need for support from significant others and from mental health practitioners. Furthermore, findings indicated that well-siblings also experienced positive changes and personal growth at different levels in facing with their brother or sister's MI, as well as hope in the future. Finally, findings indicated that in dealing with MI, well-siblings adopt different caregiving roles, as well as different coping strategies. Giving voice to well-siblings of people with MI, this meta-analysis illuminates the challenges they experience and provides a basis for recommendations to support them in facing their emotional burden and their caregiving role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.