ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Identity reconstruction and digital addiction: the paradoxical mechanism of digital inclusion among the new generation of older adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Against the backdrop of population aging and rapid digitalization in China, the new generation of older adults faces a growing paradox of digital inclusion. While digital participation can generate important benefits, it may also produce physical discomfort, health risks, psychological strain, and behavioral dependence. Methods: To achieve healthy and sustainable digital participation, this study develops an integrated framework drawing on dramaturgical, Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA), and optimal distinctiveness theories and proposes a pathway linking digital inclusion, identity reconstruction, and digital addiction. Identity reconstruction is conceptualized as a five-stage process comprising identity formulation, identification, dissemination, co-construction, and maintenance. Then algorithmic perception, platform pressure, and digital reflection are further introduced as moderating variables. Using a mixed-methods design that combines structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, this study validates the proposed framework and identifies three patterns of digital addiction: identity operation, identity reinforcement, and norm-guided. Results: The findings indicate that digital inclusion does not directly trigger digital addiction but indirectly influences sustained use through multiple stages of identity reconstruction. Moreover, algorithmic perception, platform pressure, and digital reflection exert differentiated moderating effects on the relationship between identity reconstruction and digital addiction. The three identified patterns move beyond conventional explanations based on limited digital skills, cognitive decline, or insufficient self-control, and instead reveal the central role of differentiated identity mechanisms in the formation of digital addiction. Discussion: These findings advance our understanding of the unintended consequences of digital inclusion and point to the need for multilevel interventions that better align identity needs, platform structures, and social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.