ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Effects of planting density and row spacing configuration on dry matter accumulation and distribution, nutrient content, and yield in cotton.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dry matter accumulation and distribution constitute the essential material basis for crop yield formation, directly impacting both yield and quality development. Nonetheless, the effects of planting density on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and nutrient uptake in cotton across various row spacing configurations remain ambiguous. Methods: This study conducted a two-year field experiment utilizing the cotton cultivar "Tahe 2". In 2024, a single-factor trial was adopted with three row spacing treatments: same row spacing (S3), wide-ultra-narrow row spacing (S4), and wide-narrow row planting (S6). In 2025, a two-factor split-plot design was used: main plots were the three row spacing patterns (S3, S4, S6), and subplots were three planting densities: 135 000 plants ha Results: In 2024, S6 showed the highest leaf area index (LAI) and dry matter accumulation ( Conclusion: Among the three row spacing configurations tested, the medium planting density of 180,000 plants ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.