ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Automatic gait analysis in canines using computer vision.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated analysis of feline posture using deep learning and geometric modeling.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated canine gait analysis using computer vision has the potential to extend objective canine gait assessment beyond specialized, controlled laboratories into domestic environments, but the field is comparatively less mature than human methods. This review explores the state-of-the-art for vision-based canine gait analysis, with a particular emphasis on single-camera (monocular) articulated pose and shape reconstruction, along with the extraction and interpretation of clinically relevant gait parameters. Across the literature, current pipelines reconstruct anatomical and surface representations of canines from images and video, yet rarely achieve the biomechanical fidelity or validation against gold-standard references such as motion capture, pressure walkways or fluoroscopy. Three requirements emerge from the literature: robust monocular 3D reconstruction sufficiently accurate to measure soft-tissue artifacts (approximately 10-20 mm), a standardized set of gait parameters aligned to veterinary assessment practices, and a shift from parts-based to holistic gait analysis. We highlight priority research directions to improve monitoring of canine gait in real-world settings including breed-representative datasets, synthetic training data to real-world data adaption, and ensemble learning for pathology identification. Addressing these gaps could allow for objective, longitudinal monitoring of canine gait in both veterinary practices and domestic environments. We advocate for increased interdisciplinary collaboration to foster innovation and establish new standards in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.