ReviewJSAMS plus2026
What guidance is available for people with epilepsy wanting to participate in sport and exercise? A narrative review.
Review in JSAMS plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This narrative review aimed to explore publicly available documents and policies that provide recommendations regarding safe sport and exercise participation for people with epilepsy. It also considered whether these documents addressed the needs of individuals with intellectual disability and other neurological conditions who have a co-occurring diagnosis of epilepsy. Method: A literature search was conducted across four electronic databases including PubMED, Embase, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science, accompanied by a hand search through Google Advanced Search. Documents were included if they were: 1) publicly available 2) produced by national and international government organisation, 3) published after 2016, 4) available in English, and 5) consisted of a full-text document. Results: A total of 11 papers were included. From the recommendations provided to the public four themes emerged, 1) general epilepsy advice, 2) guidance on what to do during participation, 3) considerations to avoid, and 4) activity specific recommendations. Eight of the papers provided recommendations to sport and exercise professionals, falling under three themes, 1) general epilepsy advice, 2) recommendations for sport and exercise professionals, and 3) key knowledge required to safely work with people with epilepsy. Of the 11 included papers, only four provided recommendations specific to people with disability. Conclusion: Findings revealed that whilst documents acknowledged risks, they did not provide strategies for risk mitigation or management to support participation in a variety of physical activity contexts. Additionally, the specific and often more complex needs of people with disability who have a co-occurring diagnosis of epilepsy were often overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.