Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164721›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

The Changes in Students' Satisfaction Rates Between the Accreditation Cycles by the Accreditation Commission on Colleges of Medicine (ACCM).

Ameer Soomro, Olabosipo Adeyinka Sholuade, Praveen Kottath Veetil, Manoj Kollukkad Mani, Brittany Smith, Dishitha Reddy, Sateesh B Arja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ameer SoomroMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.
Olabosipo Adeyinka SholuadeMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.
Praveen Kottath VeetilMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.ORCID 0000-0002-2360-0514
Manoj Kollukkad ManiHuman Structure and Function Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.
Brittany SmithMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.ORCID 0009-0007-3153-8144
Dishitha ReddyMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.ORCID 0009-0004-1285-6997
Sateesh B ArjaMedical Education Department, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-3348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accreditation is a key quality assurance mechanism that promotes quality improvement. Evidence shows accreditation improves student outcomes, especially licensure exam performance for international medical graduates. Accreditation Commission on Colleges of Medicine (ACCM) is one of the accreditation agencies in the Caribbean region whose accreditation standards are comparable to the accreditation standards of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), which accredits the medical schools in the USA, and ACCM is recognized by the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME). This study examines changes in students' satisfaction rates between accreditation cycles using ACCM student surveys at Avalon University School of Medicine (AUSOM). Methods: This retrospective quantitative study analyzed ACCM student survey data from 2021 and 2024 across AUSOM's basic science and clinical students. The survey assessed students' satisfaction across five institutional domains: dean's office, learning environment, library, student services, and medical education program, using a 5-point Likert scale. Mean scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 76 (response rate 75%) and 62 (63%) basic science and 115 (90%) and 85 (88.5%) clinical students responded to the survey in 2021 and 2024, respectively. The mean values for all questions were above 3.5 in both surveys. Across all domains and questionnaire items, comparisons between 2021 and 2024 revealed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05), and the satisfaction rates remained stable for basic science and clinical students. Conclusion: These findings, along with the study's results showing no significant decline in student satisfaction, differ from prior literature suggesting a dip in student satisfaction between accreditation cycles at other medical schools. Medical Schools are recommended to continue monitoring to identify subtle trends and guide targeted quality improvement initiatives, and to engage critical stakeholders, such as students, in the quality improvement process.

Indexed as

accreditationchange managementcontinuous quality improvementeducational programlearning environmentquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID42164721
PMCPMC13186211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.