Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164695›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Ziang Chen, Peng Song, Hong Fang, Wencong Tian, Jia Zhao, Yanhong Liu, Chuntao Wang, Yongjie Zhao, Lei Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziang Chen *Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Peng Song *Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0838-0339
Hong Fang *Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Wencong TianDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Jia ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yanhong LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Chuntao WangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yongjie ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Lei CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5066-9882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liver metastasis (LM) is the leading cause of treatment failure and poor survival rates in pancreatic cancer (PC). Early identification of patients at high risk for LM is crucial for optimizing clinical management. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model to accurately identify the risk of LM in PC patients and to determine the core risk factors contributing to LM. Methods: We collected data from eligible PC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015), which was divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). Feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), recursive feature elimination (RFE), and Boruta-Shap algorithms, with model parameters optimized through cross-validation. Six machine learning (ML) algorithms were developed to predict LM risk in PC patients. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV). The best-performing model was further interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Additionally, based on the optimal ML model, an online calculator was developed to provide personalized LM risk assessments for PC patients. Results: A total of 12,098 eligible PC patients were registered in the SEER database, with 8,469 assigned to the training set and 3,629 to the validation set. Using a combination of LASSO, RFE, and Boruta-Shap methods, key predictors of LM in PC were identified, including surgery, radiotherapy, tumor size, age, histological grade, primary site, pathological type, T stage, lung metastasis, and bone metastasis. All six ML models performed well in the training set, with the final model selection based on the validation set results. In the validation set, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model achieved a competitive AUC value of 0.875 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.862-0.889], with balanced sensitivity (0.851), specificity (0.776), and NPV (0.959). Furthermore, precision-recall (PR) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) consistently confirmed the superiority of the GBM model. Additionally, the SHAP framework indicated that surgery, radiotherapy, and tumor size were the primary factors influencing the predictions made by the ML model. Conclusions: The GBM model was proven to be the most effective in predicting LM in PC patients. Its robust predictive performance and interpretability provide a reliable tool for supporting personalized clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)liver metastasis (LM)machine learning (ML)Pancreatic cancer (PC)web-based calculator

Identifiers

PMID42164695
PMCPMC13184212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.