ReviewGland surgery2026
Optimizing aesthetics in immediate breast reconstruction following robot-assisted mastectomy reconstruction: a narrative review focused on cosmetic outcomes.
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Breast cancer surgery has evolved toward minimally invasive techniques, with robot-assisted mastectomy representing a significant advancement that combines oncologic safety with enhanced aesthetic outcomes and minimal scarring. This comprehensive review examines the current state of immediate reconstruction following robot-assisted mastectomy, with particular emphasis on aesthetic optimization strategies and surgical innovations that define contemporary practice. Methods: This review synthesizes extensive clinical experience from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital with contemporary literature to analyze technical innovations, surgical strategies, and aesthetic outcomes in robot-assisted mastectomy and breast reconstruction. We evaluated the evolution from conventional approaches to current robotic techniques, assessed the integration of robotic technology with advanced microsurgical reconstruction methods, and examined the impact of minimally invasive surgery on reconstruction strategies and aesthetic results. Key Content and Findings: The integration of robotic technology with microsurgical reconstruction techniques has created unprecedented opportunities for achieving exceptional cosmetic outcomes while maintaining oncologic principles. Our analysis demonstrates that robot-assisted approaches consistently achieve superior aesthetic outcomes across multiple evaluation parameters, including scar visibility, breast symmetry, and overall cosmetic appearance. These enhanced results are achieved while maintaining safety profiles comparable to conventional techniques. The minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery facilitates improved visualization, precise dissection, and optimal tissue preservation, which are critical factors for successful immediate reconstruction. Strategic surgical planning and meticulous execution optimize aesthetic outcomes through refined incision placement, tissue handling, and reconstruction timing. Conclusions: Robot-assisted mastectomy with immediate reconstruction represents a transformative approach in breast cancer surgery, delivering superior aesthetic results without compromising oncologic safety. The comprehensive integration of robotic technology with advanced reconstruction techniques establishes a new standard of care that addresses both cancer treatment efficacy and patient quality of life through optimized cosmetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.