ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Inequalities in childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccine uptake in England before and after the change from a 2 + 1 to 1 + 1 schedule: a longitudinal study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Introducing pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) into England's childhood immunisation schedule has reduced pneumococcal disease. Nonetheless, pneumococcal disease burden persists, including in young children. In January 2020, England replaced the '2 + 1' PCV schedule (two primary doses at 8 and 16 weeks, booster dose at 12 months) with a '1 + 1' PCV schedule (primary dose at 12 weeks, booster dose at 12 months). Although immunogenicity studies suggested comparable protection, the reduced-dose schedule increases reliance on timely booster uptake. We examined national trends in PCV uptake before and after the schedule change and quantified inequalities by deprivation. Methods: We analysed quarterly vaccine uptake data for 2013-2025 from COVER (Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly) for upper-tier local authorities in England, linked to 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles. We examined booster gaps-difference between primary coverage at 12 months and booster coverage at 24 months. We estimated susceptibility to vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease by birth cohort and quarter, combining observed PCV uptake with published vaccine effectiveness estimates. Findings: Booster retention deteriorated following the schedule change; mean booster gaps increased from 2.32% (2 + 1 period) to 4.79% (1 + 1 period). Inequalities widened, with differences between least and most deprived quintiles increasing from 2-3% to 4-6%. Estimated susceptibility showed marked geographical variation, with higher burden in deprived areas. Interpretation: The success of the 1 + 1 schedule depends on maintaining equitable, high booster uptake. Declining booster retention and widening inequalities risk undermining impact, highlighting the need for targeted support and strengthened follow-up systems. Funding: No specific funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.