ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Investigating the relationship between vitamin D levels and immune-mediated colitis.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential association between serum vitamin D levels and the incidence and severity of immune-mediated colitis (IMC), and to explore the potential role of vitamin D supplementation as a preventative or therapeutic intervention. Methods: This was a single-center study in which we retrospectively reviewed patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, had serum vitamin D levels measured within 6 months before or after starting treatment, and subsequently developed IMC. Results: A total of 179 patients were included in the study. Patients were stratified by serum vitamin D levels: 121 (67.6%) had levels ≤40 ng/mL, and 58 (32.4%) had levels >40 ng/mL. Individuals with vitamin D levels ≤40 ng/mL had more severe diarrhea (65.0%) and severe colitis (48.0%), both defined as common terminology criteria for adverse events grade ≥2, compared to those with vitamin D levels >40 ng/mL (45.6% and 28.6%, respectively; P=0.022 and P=0.034). Univariate analysis revealed that patients receiving vitamin D during ICI therapy had ~1.9 times higher odds of requiring steroid treatment (odds ratio [OR] 1.899, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0338-3.474; P=0.038). Patients with grade ≥2 diarrhea had 11 times higher odds of requiring steroids (OR 11.11, 95%CI 5.35-22.73; P<0.001). Patients with colitis grade ≥2 had 3 times higher odds of steroid use (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.54-6.13; P=0.001). Conclusions: This study suggests that there is a relationship between serum vitamin D levels and IMC. Vitamin D deficiency in those with IMC was associated with more severe disease, and those with more severe disease were more likely to require steroid therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.