ArticleCurrent genomics2025
CLnc-Pred: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Long Non-Coding RNAs in Crops.
Article in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- tRNA‑derived RNAs in hepatic diseases: From biological functions to clinical translation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Sepsis reporting signals associated with endothelin receptor antagonists and IFITM3-Centered interferon-responsive monocyte features: a pharmacovigilance and transcriptomic study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a major class of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) longer than 200 nucleotides. They play key roles in plant embryogenesis, root development, reproduction, and gene silencing. Accurate identification of lncRNAs in crop species is crucial for understanding their biological functions. However, most existing computational tools are designed for human and animal lncRNAs, limiting their applicability to crop genomes. Therefore, this study aims to develop a crop-specific computational tool for the accurate classification of lncRNAs and coding RNAs in crop species, addressing the limitations of current approaches. Methods: An XGBoost classifier was trained to distinguish lncRNA and coding RNA (cRNA) sequences using sequence-intrinsic features derived from five crop species: wheat, sorghum, rice, soybean, and maize. Model performance was evaluated against benchmark tools, CPC2 and PLEKv2. Results: The trained XGBoost classifier achieved an accuracy of 95.30%, precision of 93.90%, recall of 98.40%, F1-score of 96.10%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 99.40%, outperforming existing tools. These results demonstrate the model's reliability in distinguishing lncRNAs from coding RNAs. Discussion: The trained XGBoost classifier was deployed as CLnc-Pred, a web-based application that allows users to input or upload FASTA sequences for lncRNA prediction. This framework enables efficient and accurate identification of lncRNAs in crop species. Conclusion: CLnc-Pred enhances accessibility and accuracy in crop lncRNA research and supports downstream functional and regulatory analyses. Future work will focus on expanding datasets, incorporating additional plant species, and extending the framework to support multi-class classification of diverse ncRNA types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.