Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164556›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2025

Anomaly Detection with Graph Embedding in Bioinformatics: A Survey.

Tong Wang, Zhi-Ping Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tong WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China.
Zhi-Ping LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of network and data sciences, graph anomaly detection has emerged as a key research direction across multiple domains, and its application has been widely recognized in bioinformatics. Biomolecular networks, including gene regulatory networks, protein-protein interaction networks, and drug-molecule interaction networks, form the foundation of complex biological processes within organisms. Abnormal patterns within these networks are often closely associated with the onset and progression of diseases, making graph anomaly detection critically important for revealing disease mechanisms, facilitating disease diagnosis, and advancing drug development. In this paper, we review the current status of graph embedding-based anomaly detection algorithms in bioinformatics, with a particular focus on key literature and the development of dynamic graph anomaly detection algorithms. We explore how graph embedding techniques learn high-dimensional features of biomolecular networks and represent them in a low-dimensional space. Furthermore, we investigate the dynamic nature of biomolecular networks and how graph embedding algorithms can capture these changes to improve detection accuracy and efficiency. The challenges of current methods are summarized, and future directions are proposed to support key applications such as disease diagnosis, gene function annotation, and drug discovery. Through this review, we aim to provide theoretical foundations and methodological support for network anomaly detection in high-throughput omics data.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionBioinformaticsbiomarker discoverygraph embeddingmulti-omics dataneural network

Identifiers

PMID42164556
PMCPMC13154240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.