ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Construction of a LASSO regression-based predictive model for recurrence of urinary tract stones.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract stones are a common urological disease with a high risk of recurrence. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for predicting postoperative stone recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent surgical treatment for urinary tract stones at the Department of Urology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Jiangsu Province, from October 2018 to October 2024. Differential variables were first screened, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was subsequently used to identify key predictors. Six machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), LightGBM, and extra randomized trees (ExtraTrees), were used to construct prediction models. Model performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 1,000 patients were included in this study for analysis, and 15 variables were ultimately selected to construct the model. Based on the area under curve (AUC) and the DCA results in the test cohort, the XGBoost model demonstrated good performance in this study. The AUC (95% confidence interval) was 0.87 (0.81-0.92). Among all models, XGBoost demonstrated the better calibration (intercept =-0.003, slope =1.045). Conclusions: The machine learning model developed in this study showed good performance for predicting urinary tract stone recurrence. This model may be useful for postoperative risk stratification and individualized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.