ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Distant metastasis prediction in renal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using interpretable machine learning.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the predominant subtype in renal carcinoma, characterized by its limited response to chemoradiotherapy. The development of distant metastasis greatly impacts patient prognosis. This study sought to identify risk factors associated with distant metastasis in RCC. Methods: Clinical data for RCC patients from 2010 to 2021 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions (LRs) were employed to identify the most influential factors. Six machine learning techniques-LightGBM, LR, random forest, XGBoost, neural network, and gradient boosting machine (GBM)-were utilized to develop predictive models for distant metastasis. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis enabled visual interpretation for each patient. Model performance was evaluated through metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), Brier score, and estimated calibration index. Results: In predicting distant metastasis, the GBM model surpassed the performance of the other five machine learning algorithms. The GBM model demonstrated best overall performance with an AUC value of 0.907 (95% confidence interval: 0.899-0.914). The GBM model's calibration curve achieved a minimum Brier score of 0.047 (range, 0.042-0.052). SHAP analysis independently confirmed key clinical factors linked to metastasis risk in RCC patients. Conclusions: This study created a precise machine learning model to predict distant metastasis in RCC patients, offering clinicians valuable decision-support for personalized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.