ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Efficacy analysis of transurethral
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative Safety and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Multicenter Real-World Study of 668 Patients.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: En bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) is a surgical treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, data on the efficacy and safety of ERBT for tumors ≥3 cm are limited. This study aimed to investigate the technical characteristics and clinical application of β-electrode ERBT in the treatment of bladder tumors ≥3 cm and analyze its feasibility and short-term safety. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from patients with bladder cancer (BC) who underwent β-electrode ERBT between 2021 and 2024. Surgical Procedure: A mark was made 0.5 cm from the tumor margin. The knife tip was inserted into the submucosal layer at the marked site and retracted away from the bladder wall. The tumor was completely resected using a combination of hook dissection and blunt separation, followed by removal. For larger tumors, Results: This study enrolled 102 patients with tumor size ≥3 cm. The median operative time was 50.0 (IQR: 34.5, 90.0) minutes, with 73 (71.6%) cases involving DM. No obturator nerve reflex occurred intraoperatively in any patient. Postoperative complications were observed in 10 patients, among which urinary tract infection was the most common (n=5). During a median follow-up of 22.5 (IQR: 14.0, 29.3) months, 10 recurrences and 4 progressions were recorded. The 2-year RFS and 2-year PFS were 90.2% and 96.9%, respectively. Conclusions: β-electrode ERBT is a selective surgical approach for bladder tumors ≥3 cm, demonstrating favorable short-term efficacy with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications, and a good short-term oncological prognosis after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.