Validating free spectral range tracking as a robust method for mitigating artifacts in VSC kinetics.

Kaihao Gu, Xinmin Zhao, Runling Peng, Feng Zhang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaihao GuTerahertz Technology Innovation Research Institute, Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging Technology Cooperative Innovation Center, Shanghai Key Lab of Modern Optical System, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093 China fzhang@usst.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3205-8714

Xinmin ZhaoTerahertz Technology Innovation Research Institute, Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging Technology Cooperative Innovation Center, Shanghai Key Lab of Modern Optical System, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093 China fzhang@usst.edu.cn.

Runling PengTerahertz Technology Innovation Research Institute, Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging Technology Cooperative Innovation Center, Shanghai Key Lab of Modern Optical System, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093 China fzhang@usst.edu.cn.

Feng ZhangTerahertz Technology Innovation Research Institute, Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging Technology Cooperative Innovation Center, Shanghai Key Lab of Modern Optical System, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093 China fzhang@usst.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-4829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrational strong coupling (VSC) has been reported to modify ground-state chemical reactivity; however, quantitative interpretation of cavity-controlled kinetics depends critically on the spectroscopic observable used to extract rate constants. Here, we systematically compare two commonly employed cavity readout strategies-single-mode frequency shifts (Δ

Identifiers

PMID42164308

DOI10.1039/d6ra01794k

PMCPMC13185703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.