ArticleRSC advances2026
Hydrophobic modification of a polyurethane sponge
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A conventional polyurethane (PU) sponge shows less selectivity, which restricts its ability to favorably absorb oils. To address this limitation, the sponge surface was engineered using a simple, low-cost, and environmentally friendly emulsion polymerization approach, which produced a uniform coating and significantly improved the oil-absorption capacity. The structural formula, surface morphology and wettability of the modified sponges were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and contact angle measurement techniques, respectively. The key parameters influencing the modification, including the amount of monomer, selection of the water/ethanol ratio and the concentration of the cross-linker divinylbenzene, were systematically optimized. After surface treatment, the water contact angle of the sponge increased significantly from about 85° to 154°, representing strong hydrophobicity. The modified sponges exhibited excellent selectivity, efficiently removing oils and organic liquids from oil/water and organic liquid/water systems, respectively, at saturation. They delivered high absorption capacities, ranging from 21 to 75 times their weight, while suppressing water uptake by approximately 94%. Furthermore, the materials achieved separation efficiencies exceeding 98.4% for trace oil removal and retained substantial absorption capacity even after 15 reuse cycles. These results demonstrate that a simple modification strategy can yield a low-cost, high-performance, and environmentally benign sponge, making it a highly promising candidate for oil spill remediation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.