Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164282›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Mendelian Randomization to Examine the Causal Effects of Cystatin on Ovarian Lesions.

Tianqing Yan, Lin Guo, Renquan Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianqing YanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Lin GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Renquan LuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cystatin, a superfamily of cysteine protease inhibitors, are implicated in extracellular matrix remodeling, immune modulation, and tumor progression. Observational studies have reported associations between specific cystatin and gynecological pathologies, including ovarian cancer. However, whether these associations reflect causality remains uncertain due to potential confounding and reverse causation. Methods: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationships between genetically predicted levels of seven cystatin subtypes (Cystatin B, C, D, F, M, S, and Cystatin 8) and the risk of various ovarian lesions. Genetic instruments (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) for cystatin were selected from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) at a significance threshold of Results: Genetically predicted Cystatin-8 was significantly associated with a reduced risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer (OR = 0.898, 95% CI: 0.836-0.965, Conclusion: This MR study provides genetic evidence supporting a potential causal, protective role for Cystatin-8 against endometrioid ovarian cancer, and suggestive protective roles for Cystatin-C in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and Cystatin-F in polycystic ovarian syndrome. These findings highlight specific cystatin as potential biomarkers or etiological factors warranting further mechanistic and clinical investigation in ovarian pathophysiology.

Indexed as

causal inferencecysteine protease inhibitorsMendelian randomizationovarian cancerovarian lesions

Identifiers

PMID42164282
PMCPMC13186221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.