Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164271›Full record

ArticleThe Social service review2026

Monthly Child Tax Credit Receipt and Spending, Household Structure, and Race and Ethnicity.

Youngjin Stephanie Hong, Dylan Bellisle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Social service review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Youngjin Stephanie HongUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Dylan BellisleDominican University.

Funding

Health Disparities Research Scholars Training Program-RenewalT32HD049302 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Maureen S Durkin · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, there was a historic, although temporary, expansion to the Child Tax Credit (CTC), shifting it to a near-universal monthly child allowance. Building on previous literature that suggests a growing heterogeneity in family structure intersects with access to safety net programs, we examine how household structure and race/ethnicity independently shaped the patterns of receiving and spending the monthly CTC, and how they jointly shaped the receipt and spending patterns during the second half of 2021. Using the Census Household Pulse Survey and multivariate regression models, we find population-level evidence among CTC-eligible households that unmarried women and unmarried men were both less likely than their married counterparts to report receiving the monthly CTC, with significantly larger gaps observed for unmarried men than for unmarried women. The interaction effect analysis reveals a more nuanced finding that such disparities between married couples and unmarried women are more pronounced among White populations. Analyses on spending show that the monthly CTC played a particularly important role in helping unmarried women of color meet their basic needs and child-related expenses. The present study demonstrates the potential benefit of having a child allowance policy, while highlighting ongoing inequities in access to the CTC despite its near-universal expansion. Findings underscore the need for more targeted outreach efforts, accessible tax filing support services, and a more simplified tax filing process.

Identifiers

PMID42164271
PMCPMC13186443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.