ArticleCureus2026
Thrombus or Vegetation: A Diagnostic Dilemma in Cardiac Imaging.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac masses identified on echocardiography can pose significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when differentiating between thrombi and vegetations, which require markedly different management approaches. We present the case of a 57-year-old postmenopausal woman with a history of thymic cancer and recent pulmonary embolism (PE), who presented with abdominal pain, weight loss, and laboratory findings consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large fibroid uterus with multiple masses concerning for leiomyosarcoma or leiomyoma, and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed a large echo density on the tricuspid valve and a bicuspid aortic valve with mild-to-moderate stenosis. Further evaluation with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) confirmed a large mass on the tricuspid valve and also revealed multiple echo densities on the mitral and aortic valves. Cardiac MRI (CMR) demonstrated thickened, mobile tricuspid valve leaflets with moderate regurgitation; mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation was also seen, along with thickening of the mitral valve leaflets. However, the nature of the masses remained unclear. Despite negative blood cultures, the clinical and imaging findings raised suspicion for non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), though thrombi remained a differential consideration. Given the patient's hypercoagulable state, a multidisciplinary team initiated anticoagulation and arranged close outpatient follow-up. A cervical lymph node biopsy subsequently confirmed metastatic, poorly differentiated carcinoma with immunohistochemistry positive for CKAE1/AE3, HMWCK, and PAX8, suggesting either recurrent thymic malignancy or a primary uterine origin. A few months later, repeat TTE showed reduced severity of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and the valvular masses were less apparent. The patient is currently undergoing palliative chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and dostarlimab, continues on lifelong anticoagulation, and receives comprehensive pain management. This case underscores the diagnostic complexity of cardiac masses, particularly in patients with malignancy. It highlights the critical role that multimodality imaging plays in resolving complex diagnostic dilemmas and emphasizes the importance of a collaborative approach in managing such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.