ArticleCureus2026
Outcomes of the Herringbone Suturing Technique for the Closure of Anterior Abdominal Wall Surgeries: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Anterior abdominal wall closure following midline laparotomy plays a crucial role in determining postoperative outcomes. Complications such as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia continue to contribute significantly to postoperative morbidity, particularly in emergency surgical settings. Conventional closure techniques may not always provide uniform tension distribution across the vertically divided linea alba. The herringbone suturing technique, characterized by a continuous crisscross pattern, has been proposed to enhance tensile strength and wound stability. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of the herringbone suturing technique for anterior abdominal wall closure following midline laparotomy. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore. A total of 88 patients aged 18-60 years undergoing midline laparotomy were included over a six-month period, with an additional six-month follow-up. Abdominal wall closure was performed using a single-layer continuous herringbone suturing technique with loop PDS-1 sutures. Primary outcome measures included postoperative complications such as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, fascial dehiscence, and burst abdomen. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of incisional hernia, postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, length of hospital stay, and time to return to routine activities. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results An uncomplicated postoperative course was observed in 78 (88.6%) patients. The overall postoperative complication rate was 11.4%. Surgical site infection was the most common complication, occurring in 10 (11.4%) patients, predominantly superficial and detected within the first 14 postoperative days. Superficial wound dehiscence occurred in seven (8.0%) patients, while fascial dehiscence was noted in three (3.4%) patients. No cases of burst abdomen were recorded. An incisional hernia was observed in one (1.1%) patient during the six-month follow-up. No significant association was found between postoperative complications and age, sex, type of surgery, or preoperative diagnosis. Conclusions The herringbone suturing technique appears to be a safe and effective method for anterior abdominal wall closure following midline laparotomy, with low rates of early and late postoperative complications. Its consistent performance in both emergency and elective settings suggests that it may serve as a reliable alternative to conventional closure techniques. Further multicentric studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are recommended to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.