Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164187›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Presepsin as a Prognostic Biomarker for Short-Term Mortality in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

Akshay Rajeev, Sabah Shakeel Shaikh, Harnoor Kaur, Archit Sharma, Palangutde Katherine Dimowo, Bhavna Murugesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akshay RajeevHematology, Great Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, GBR.
Sabah Shakeel ShaikhDiabetes and Endocrinology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Harnoor KaurInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Archit SharmaPediatrics, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, GBR.
Palangutde Katherine DimowoOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Bhavna MurugeshInfectious Disease, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition that continues to be a significant global health concern. It is well recognised as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalised and critically ill patients of all age groups. Several clinical severity scores, such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE), are commonly used to identify and categorise sepsis. However, such clinical tools often require multiple physiological parameters and may not always provide rapid prognostic information. Similarly, inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin exhibit variable prognostic value when used alone. Presepsin, a soluble CD14 subtype released when macrophages and monocytes are activated as part of the human innate immune response to infection, has emerged as a promising biomarker to predict infection severity and adverse outcomes in sepsis. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate whether presepsin could serve as a reliable marker to predict short-term (28-day or 30-day) mortality among adult patients with sepsis. A detailed literature search and screening were conducted using PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020) guidelines across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Following the screening process, a total of 19 observational studies and one systematic review were ultimately selected for the final analysis. Presepsin levels were generally higher in patients with greater disease severity and frequently higher in non-survivors. Although presepsin demonstrated moderate prognostic performance, established clinical severity scores often outperformed presepsin. Overall, existing evidence suggests that presepsin may provide additional prognostic value when integrated with established clinical scoring tools.

Indexed as

presepsin (cd14-st)scd14sepsis and septic shocksepsis markerssepsis prognosis

Identifiers

PMID42164187
PMCPMC13184774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.