Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Evaluation of large language models in a pulmonology outpatient clinic using structured clinical data and chest radiographs: a single-center prospective observational study.

Hayriye Bektaş Aksoy, Selda Günaydın, Şaban Melih Şimşek, Ruhsel Cörüt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hayriye Bektaş AksoyDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.
Selda GünaydınDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.
Şaban Melih ŞimşekDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.
Ruhsel CörütDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Large language models (LLMs) may support clinical reasoning, yet real-world outpatient studies integrating structured clinical data with chest radiographs (CXRs) remain limited. We compared three LLMs for pulmonary differential diagnosis in routine clinical practice. Methods: In this prospective, single-center observational study, consecutive adult outpatients presenting with respiratory complaints between 06 October and 31 December 2025 were enrolled. For each case, a standardized structured clinical form and de-identified CXRs were provided to three LLMs (ChatGPT-5.2, Google Gemini 3 Flash, and Microsoft Copilot) and to three blinded pulmonologists. The primary diagnosis was assigned by the examining pulmonologist, and the reference diagnosis was defined by agreement of at least two blinded pulmonologists. Concordance and Cohen's kappa were assessed. Results: A total of 120 patients were included. Agreement among the blinded pulmonologists was high, and agreement between the primary and reference diagnoses was excellent. Compared with the reference diagnosis, ChatGPT-5.2 and Microsoft Copilot showed higher concordance than Google Gemini 3 Flash, with both demonstrating moderate overall agreement. Concordance did not differ by age or sex. Across diagnostic categories, performance was highest for pneumonia/upper respiratory tract infection and asthma. Discussion: In this real-world pulmonology outpatient cohort, ChatGPT-5.2 and Microsoft Copilot showed better diagnostic concordance than Google Gemini 3 Flash when structured clinical data and CXRs were evaluated together. These findings support the potential role of LLMs as adjunctive decision-support tools in pulmonology, while also indicating that performance remains diagnosis-dependent and insufficient to replace expert clinical judgment.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportdiagnostic concordancemultimodal large language modelsphysician-referenced benchmarkingpulmonology

Identifiers

PMID42164160
PMCPMC13183838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.