ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Bedside ultrasound-assisted manual reduction in ultrasound-selected, non-transient pediatric intussusception: a single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of bedside, single-operator ultrasound-assisted manual reduction (UAMR) in ultrasound-selected, non-transient pediatric intussusception in routine clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 119 ultrasound-selected, non-transient pediatric intussusception encounters managed with bedside UAMR between March 2023 and December 2025. Encounter-level baseline characteristics and index-encounter UAMR outcomes were summarized. Because standardized segment-length measurements and post-discharge recurrence data were not uniformly available in the medical records, the analysis focused on documented clinical characteristics, repeat-attempt patterns, overall bedside success, and the absence of major documented complications. Results: Among 119 encounters, the median age was 5.0 years (IQR 3.0-6.0), and 58 (48.7%) were boys. Multiple intussusceptions, lymph node enlargement, and ascites were documented in 12 (10.1%), 60 (50.4%), and 10 (8.4%) encounters, respectively. UAMR achieved complete resolution on the first attempt in 111/119 encounters (93.3%); 6 additional encounters resolved after repeated bedside attempts (5 on the second attempt and 1 on the third), yielding an overall index-encounter success rate of 117/119 (98.3%). Two encounters remained unreduced. No perforation or bleeding was documented in the available records. The recorded check-to-report interval had a median of 13.6 min (IQR 9.1-29.2). Conclusion: In this single-center series, bedside UAMR showed high index-encounter success and no documented major procedural complications among ultrasound-selected, non-transient pediatric intussusception encounters. Prospective studies with standardized eligibility criteria, stopwatch-measured manipulation time, and structured recurrence follow-up are needed before broader practice recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.