ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Swallowing impairment and aspiration risk in clinically stabilized patients hospitalized for acute respiratory events: a cohort-wide machine-learning analysis with COPD-specific insights.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize swallowing impairment and aspiration risk in patients recovering from acute respiratory events and to identify clinical, functional, and anatomical predictors of airway invasion with a specific focus on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) subgroup. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, adults hospitalized for pneumonia or acute respiratory failure underwent videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) after clinical stabilization. Airway invasion was graded using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Predictors of aspiration (PAS ≥ 6) were explored using multivariable logistic regression with bootstrap confidence intervals and age-adjusted marginal standardization. A Random Forest model was used to assess discrimination and identify key predictors, including a dedicated analysis in the COPD subgroup. Results: A total of 101 patients were included [mean age 60 years (range 17-85); 58.4% male]. Among them, 25 exhibited aspiration and 20% penetration despite clinical stabilization; nearly half of COPD patients fell within PAS 6-8. Vallecular and hypopharyngeal residue increased progressively across PAS categories, rising from 52 and 25% in PAS 1-2 to 84 and 100% in PAS 6-8, respectively, consistent with a severity-dependent pattern of impaired bolus clearance and increased vulnerability to airway invasion. Age-adjusted aspiration risk varied across pathologies, with the highest probabilities observed in neuromuscular diseases. The Random Forest model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.90), identifying age and recent bronchitis as influential predictors. In COPD, semisolid aspiration and vallecular residue emerged as the most relevant physiologic predictors across both regression and machine-learning analyses. Conclusion: Swallowing impairment and aspiration are frequent after acute respiratory events, including in COPD. Recent bronchitis and pharyngeal residue represent clinically relevant markers of aspiration risk. Early, structured swallowing assessment may help identify vulnerable patients and guide targeted interventions to reduce aspiration-related respiratory morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.