Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164138›Full record

ArticleFood security2026

Barriers and opportunities to smallholder goat enterprise in Botswana.

Lovemore C Gwiriri, Honest Machekano, Andrew S Cooke, Casper Nyamukondiwa, Andrews Safalaoh, Javier Ventura-Cordero, Paul Airs, Jan van Wyk, Patson Nalivata, Winchester Mvula and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food security, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lovemore C GwiririCentre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Honest MachekanoBotswana International University of Science and Technology, P. Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Andrew S CookeNet-Zero and Resilient Agriculture, Rothamsted Research, Okehampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-1890
Casper NyamukondiwaBotswana International University of Science and Technology, P. Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Andrews SafalaohLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Javier Ventura-CorderoInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Paul AirsInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jan van WykDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 South Africa.
Patson NalivataLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Winchester MvulaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Virgil JosephBotswana International University of Science and Technology, P. Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Jonathan H I TinsleyInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Michael R F LeeSchool of Sustainable Food and Farming, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire UK.
Eric R MorganInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Taro TakahashiNet-Zero and Resilient Agriculture, Rothamsted Research, Okehampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smallholder households across rural sub-Saharan Africa often rely on goats to support their livelihoods, food security, and financial security, and as a risk mitigation strategy. Across the region, goat health and performance outcomes vary greatly, and it is often difficult to quantify the impact of the animal health-nutrition nexus on livelihood outcomes. Two socio-economic surveys were conducted to this end in Botswana. Firstly, a general cross-sectional survey of 787 rural households to assess the correlation between food and/or financial security and livestock practices. Secondly, a more nuanced survey of a sub-group of 44 goat-owning smallholders to understand the systemic interlinkages between livelihood outcomes, veterinary care, and goat management. While the importance of livestock to rural communities was confirmed by a positive association with improved food, financial and asset security, household variation was explained more by herd size and self-reported importance of goat ownership to households, than to goat health condition. Four main barriers were identified which negatively influenced goat ownership and herd survivability patterns: (1) low turnover rates and poor access to capital investment; (2) Limited use of supplementary feeds; (3) Poor access to veterinary services; and (4) Age and gender. Strategies to improve the productivity and sustainability of goat enterprises within the region should focus on overcoming these barriers, with the potential in doing so to improve food and financial security, and equality outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12571-026-01648-7.

Indexed as

AgricultureGenderLivestockRuminantsVeterinary

Identifiers

PMID42164138
PMCPMC13183765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.