ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Integrating neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers to predict preclinical Alzheimer's disease progression.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special Issue "Molecular Advances in Biomarkers of Central Nervous System Diseases and Disorders".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The application progress of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a multimodal model integrating neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers for predicting the risk of cognitive progression in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 320 patients with Aβ-positive preclinical AD or AD-related mild cognitive impairment. Participants were randomly allocated into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, univariable analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and multivariable Logistic regression were employed to identify core predictive variables. Subsequently, four machine learning models were constructed based on these variables. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: The baseline characteristics were balanced between the training and validation sets. LASSO regression identified five core variables: Mini-Mental State Examination total score, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed recall, normalized hippocampal volume, plasma phosphorylated tau181, and apolipoprotein E ε4 allele status. Multivariable analysis confirmed these as independent predictors ( Conclusion: The developed multimodal model exhibits robust predictive performance and clinical utility. It may serve as a quantitative tool for individualized risk management in preclinical AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.