Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164125›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026

Real-world data on the impact of dose reduction measures on radiation exposure in CT perfusion of the brain.

Friederike Lang, Thomas Stein, Till Schürmann, Martin Fiebich, Fabian Bamberg, Horst Urbach, Elias Kellner, Alexander Rau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Friederike LangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas SteinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Till SchürmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin FiebichUniversity of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen, Faculty of Life Science Engineering, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gießen, Germany.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Horst UrbachDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elias KellnerMedical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander RauDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CT perfusion (CTP) imaging is a valuable tool for assessing cerebral blood flow. However, it is associated with high radiation doses, often exceeding those of non-contrast cranial CT. We evaluated the impact of different dose reduction approaches in CTP. Methods: We retrospectively included patients who underwent CTP in a stroke referral center. Imaging was performed using four different scanners. The protocols were iteratively optimized by decreasing the tube current time product through lowering the tube current while maintaining a constant tube rotation time. Additionally, the temporal sampling interval was increased from 1.5 to 3.0 s. Volume CT dose index (CTDI Results: Radiation doses from 3812 cases with CTP (47.5% female, mean age 73 ± 14 years) were evaluated. Reducing the tube current by one third resulted in a dose decrease of 33.1%. Doubling the temporal sampling interval significantly reduced the dose by approximately half (47.3%-51.7%) across all scanners (all Conclusion: Dose reduction measures allow for scanning CTP with exposure levels close to those of standard non-contrast CT.

Indexed as

Cancer RiskComputed TomographyPerfusion ImagingRadiation DoseStroke Imaging

Identifiers

PMID42164125
PMCPMC13186064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.