ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Skin tumor identification by means of convolutional neural network and improved gray wolf optimizer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early and accurate diagnosis of skin cancer has a huge impact on the survival rate of patients and deep learning-based CNN and dermatologists' intelligence support can fasten the diagnosis not only within the clinics but also outside. Methods: This paper introduces a hybrid classification framework for automatic detection of melanoma that combines deep learning and better optimization. A modified GWO method called improved GWO (IGWO) has been proposed which can efficiently optimize CNN parameters and feature learning. Conventional GWO has drawbacks such as early convergence and poor exploration in high-dimensional spaces, so the IGWO regenerates the weak omega agents based on their fitness level. The underperforming omega wolves were discarded in every step and then either the elite solutions (alpha, beta, delta) or the stochastically resampled solution was put to the wolves so that both exploration and exploitation would reach better state. Results: The presented CNN/IGWO model has been experimented with a skin cancer dataset SIIM-ISIC 2020. The proposed model yielded test accuracy of 98.47% and AUC of 98.2 respectively that were both higher than those models using basic GWO method and other state-of-the-art deep learning methods. Discussion: These outcomes show that using the IGWO mechanism along with training of CNN speeds up convergence, enhances the solution and thus the classification performance. The proposed method shows that intelligence-based optimization could give more practical, accurate results in automated melanoma diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.