Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164110›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma: Comparative analysis against established paradigms using the National Cancer Data Base.

Josiah K Low, John E Musser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Josiah K LowNaval Medical Center San Diego San Diego California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-5201
John E MusserNaval Medical Center San Diego San Diego California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to perform a comparative, real-world analysis of outcomes after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for clinical stage II (CSII) seminoma. Patients and Methods: Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified patients with CSII germ cell tumours (GCT) between 2004 and 2022. Cox regression was used for survival analyses. Primary analysis examined overall survival (OS) for patients with CSII seminoma. A sensitivity analysis after energy-balancing weighting was performed. Secondary analysis examined salvage-chemotherapy-free survival (SFS) after pRPLND for CSII seminoma. Results: Primary analysis included 4661 patients (median follow-up 6.8 years, IQR 3.6-10.5 years). OS did not differ by primary treatment (vs. chemotherapy-HR1.34, 95% CI 0.93-1.93, Conclusion: OS after pRPLND for CSII seminoma appears comparable to alternatives. Risk of receiving salvage chemotherapy increases with clinical disease extent.

Indexed as

chemotherapydatabaseretroperitoneal lymph node dissectionseminomatesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID42164110
PMCPMC13183590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.