Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164100›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Urban vibrancy: An analogy of biodiversity, retail diversity, and activity-based urban diversity measures.

Edward Chung Yim Yiu, Diogo Pacheco, Riccardo Di Clemente, Federico Botta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward Chung Yim YiuDepartment of Property, University of Auckland Business School, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-8276
Diogo PachecoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8199-585X
Riccardo Di ClementeComplex Connections Lab, Network Science Institute, Northeastern University London, London E1W 1LP, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-6351
Federico BottaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-4535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in urban studies is what makes a city vibrant-where vibrancy reflects the dynamic social energy of urban life. Traditional measures such as population density and land-use mix often fail to capture this dynamism. Drawing an analogy from ecology and retail studies, where biodiversity and retail diversity are quantified through species or tenant richness and abundance, this paper proposes a new framework for understanding urban vibrancy through the lens of activity diversity. We present a theoretical model of the key determinants of vibrancy, showing how a diversity of urban activities enhances the vitality of cities by offering a range of services and experiences without leading to overcrowding. We further extend the ecological analogy to the management of urban overdiversity, applying principles such as carrying capacity, density-dependent regulation, and niche differentiation. The paper also introduces a taxonomy for classifying urban activities in relation to vibrancy and concludes with a roadmap outlining the challenges and opportunities of this framework. Together, these insights advance our understanding of how cities thrive and offer guidance for planning strategies that balance vibrancy with sustainability.

Indexed as

biodiversityecological analogyurban densityurban planningurban vibrancy

Identifiers

PMID42164100
PMCPMC13185148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.